Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

Filed under: education

SOPA PIPA and the Classroom Use of Digital Media

Media_httpuploadwikim_ncfih
Wednesday's blackouts by companies like Wikipedia and Reddit have raised much needed awareness about the Stop Online Privacy Act and the Protect IP Act. If you would like to do your part to support freedom of speech and prevent internet censorship, please visit americancensorship.org. As the debate continues, let's take some time to review the current state of digital media in the classroom.

The Internet provides access to a vast source of information, some of which ends up in classrooms. Multimedia projects have become a popular addition to classroom assignments. Their use, however, raises questions about the legal and ethical use of images, video, and audio obtained from the Internet. What are the limitations and restrictions to the use of media in the classroom? What are teachers allowed to use for instruction and what are students allowed to use for classroom projects? These questions and their answers need to be considered by teachers to avoid messy copyright violations.

Teachers can visit the site of the United States Copyright Office to read about the law that should be followed in the use of digital media. Although the site is full of legalese, there are a number of other sites that provide a quick reference chart for classroom use. Teachers should make students aware that not everything on the web is free to copy, download, and use at their discretion. Although education has been given a somewhat greater leniency with regard to the use of copyrighted material through fair use, it is vital that teachers know what those limitations are.

Teachers should encourage students to search and utilize media that is within the public domain or with creative commons licenses that provide freedom of use explicitly stated by the author. The exploration, ideas, and creativity of students does not need to be stifled by copyright laws, instead they can be redirected and schooled in the ethical use of material originated by others.

 

Striking a Chord

Educational budget cutbacks have had a startling and detrimental effect on school districts around the country.  The arts have been especially aware of these reductions bearing the brunt of them.  The focus on music education, however, has grown as a means of enhancing critical thinking skills.  
 
In the National Association for Music Education, January 2012 edition of "Teaching Music" the argument is made that critical thinking can be enhanced through the teaching of music.   The premise is based on a study by Daniel C. Johnson, "The Effect of Critical Thinking On Verbal Descriptions of Music." His results conclude that lessons that are only activity-based are less effective than lessons that incorporate opportunities for creativity and collaboration.
Media_httpfarm4static_sabiu

Music teachers can look forward to Johnson's future publication of the lesson plans that his study found as effective methods, such as the use of open-ended questions and student interaction.  Although Johnson's study focused on music education, it reminds teachers in all subject areas of the importance of collaboration and creativity.   Collaboration and creativity are also two of the four C's need for 21st Century Learning, which also include communication and critical thinking.

Teachers can use a number of Internet tools to support their promotion of the 4 C's.   Collaboration can be facilitated through the use of Wikispaces, blogs, or Google Docs.  Whether the lesson being taught is in music or science, students learn to consider the ideas of others and work and communicate effectively to accomplish a common goal through collaboration.  Flexibility and learning to value and respect the input of team members is a skill that future employers will be seeking from today's students.  Glogster can be used to combine creativity and collaboration through the collection of media on an interactive format.  Students must think critically in the completion of Glogs in order to respond to a lesson's objectives and communicate their own ideas.

The arts have a vital place in our schools and the precarious position they have been placed in because of budget cuts highlights the importance of Johnson's study.  The arts not only provide an outlet for students to display their talents but also exercises and performances requiring math, reading, and analytical skills.  The inclusion of the arts in education, however, goes beyond literacy skills, but also builds confidence and self-esteem in students that can be very powerful in helping them succeed.

 

Transforming Elementary Education: an evening with Sir Ken Robinson (and Poll Everywhere)

Event_header

Educators throughout the Los Angeles area were treated to an evening with internationally renowned author, speaker, and leader in the field of education, Sir Ken Robinson. In 2006, Sir Ken Robinson spoke at a TED (Technology, Entertainment, and Design) conference that is considered one of the most-watched videos on TED with over 8 million views, and his thought-provoking discourse on the way we educate children has been described as visionary. On November 4, 2001, over 700 educators from more than 100 schools were inspired by his ideas on the betterment of education.

The event held by the Center for the Future of Elementary Education (CFEE) at Curtis School was dubbed a resounding success as noted by the flourish of compliments received by their Poll Everywhere Response Wall.  This Response Wall was featured prominently at the event on a 17' projection screen both before formal remarks and during the Town Hall session.  Still collecting responses, the Response Wall has been embedded on the cfee site.  Poll Everywhere worked closely with organizer Christopher Thinnes, Head of Upper Elementary School & Academic Dean, Curtis School, to develop a plan that fit their needs.

(download)
Congratulations to the organizers of this event and for continuing to promote and advance the future of education.

Read the rest of this post »

Mobile Learning Toolkit - Jenni Parker

What's in a m-learning toolkit? Well according to Jenni Parker that would be tools like twitter, Audacity, FrontlineSMS, and (you guessed it) Poll Everywhere! Check out Jenni's thesis, embedded below, to learn about mobile training activities that are applicable not only in developing countries but in your own classroom as well.

 

"The result of [Jenni's] thesis project is a Mobile Learning Toolkit that is designed to empower trainers in Africa and other developing contexts to integrate mobile learning into their teaching." from Jenni Parker's blog

 

 

best viewed in 'book' mode | the toolkit is open source and available for download

 

Meet Jenni Parker.

Originally from Scotland, Jenni recently graduated from Politecnico di Milano, Italy with an MS in Product Service Systems Design. She is currently working for the Global Learning Centre of the UNHCR in Budapest.

We stumbled across Jenni (and her wonderful thesis) a few months ago. Jenni has dedicated her studies to teaching in developing contexts, through the use of mobile learning. Jenni would like to stress the opensource nature of her thesis. "No one ever reads your thesis ... [and] I wanted to do something useful." She encourages you to share her project and contact her with any comments or questions.

 

Students Love Technology - (we knew it!)

Onlineeducation.net put together an infographic about college students and technology:

  • Some of it is obvious: "98% of college students own a digital device"
  • Some of it is perplexing (yet reassuring): College students spend "181.43 avg. minutes/per day on cell texting"
  • Some of it is alarming: "A University of Maryland study asked students not to use media for 24 hours. A large percentage of the students experienced symptoms similar to drug and alcohol withdrawal."

Check it out! (The notes in this graphic must have been written by one of the 30% of students who don't use a digital device for note taking ...)

Students Love Technology
Via: OnlineEducation.net

Editing Participant Data

We call them your "participants".

You might call them your audience, your voters, your students, or your attendees.

Whatever you call them, there's a good chance you have hundreds of them, and you want to have accurate data in Poll Everywhere. The Registered Participants feature is one of the ways you can identify who responded. It's also used for grade reports and restricting who can respond.

We found there are lots of times where the administrator just needs to help a participant get the right information into Poll Everywhere, whether it's resetting a password for someone at a live event, or double checking the phone number on file after class.

On your Participants List, just click "edit".

Editing_participant_registration

Here's a demo video showing both participant registration and an administrator editing that information later.

The Poll Everywhere K-12 Classroom Size Promise

It's no coincidence that we set the number of allowed responses at 32 responses per poll when we first launched our education plans at Poll Everywhere over one year ago. Why 32 responses? Because we read somewhere that was the average size of a classroom in the United States. Since then, we've learned that averages don't count for much when a teacher wanted to try Poll Everywhere in a classroom with 35 students, but couldn't because we only allowed 32 responses per poll.

Today that limitation ends with our classroom size promise. We started by increasing the classroom size limit on our K-12 free plan from 32 students to 40, but we didn't just stop there. If your classroom has over 40 students, you can contact us, explain your situation, and we'll accomodate you as best we can. We go into all the details in our FAQ.

Our goal is still to make a product that educators love so much that they eventually pay for our premium features, like the awesome new segmentation feature. While we can't sustainably give everything away for free, we're thrilled that classroom size is one less thing educators need to worry about when they're evaluating Poll Everywhere as a classroom response system.

 

Change_your_plan__poll_everywhere

 

First Day of School: New <3 for K12

We have an exciting Back to School announcement.

Remember this blog post? Should we even offer a free product for educators? It's the most popular blog post we ever wrote -- over 35,000 views.  

Two companies saw what we were struggling with and offered to help. Qualcomm and Mobile Messenger have provided us with advice, valuable introductions, and even in-kind services that will enable huge improvements with our education lineup.

K-12 Teacher pricing has been cut by 60% - The $129/year plan is now $50/year

It's not just about price. We've been working all summer on education-related features:
  • Improving the Mac applications such as Keynote integration
  • iPad live-results compatibility (announcement)
  • (Very soon) Out-of-classroom surveys
  • Automatic grading. Here's what our new grading feature looks like: 

(download)

For all our teachers that are already on the $129/year plan, you have several new features waiting for you that the $50 plan doesn't include: 1) You can now send custom reply text messages when a student votes 2) You can use our new Broadcast Lists feature. The K12 Broadcast Lists feature will allow you to broadcast messages directly to your students phones individually or as a group. You can use this to send assignment reminders or even push questions out to students after school. To get started, just click "Lists" at the top of your page. 

(download)

On a related note, all education users will be switched over to a new 5 digit short code (37607) in a few weeks. Don't worry, 22333 will still work.

Educators, thank you for blogging so much about us - that really helps us.  To get geared up for the new school year, enjoy Taylor Mali on What Teacher's Make.

Should we even offer a free product for educators?

Hi - I'm Jeff, one of the Poll Everywhere cofounders.

About a week ago, we developed a feature that archives results into a timeline instead of just clearing them away forever. We knew this would be especially useful for educators who would like to reuse their polls with multiple classes and yet retain the previous answers, or for measuring knowledge before-and-after. In the future, we'll add the ability to visually compare these various runs of a poll on a graph.

We like educators for a variety of reasons, so in the past we've told teachers they can clear their results and reuse their polls with other classes. Technically, they have more than the 32 participants allowed on the free plan, but we decided to kind of look the other way mostly for mutual convenience.  One thing is certain, the more participants on any given question, the more you're benefitting from our service.

In the process of preparing this results history / archival feature, we analyzed our usage and found that the users that do this can be REALLY expensive for us.

I know we've all been conditioned to expect a free product from every web company out there, but the trend is not going this way. More and more web companies are transitioning to a "30 day free trial" model.  We've considered it many times, because if the percentage of people who remain regular users and never actually upgrade continues, we might not be able to sustain the incredible cost of text messages for our many free users. It probably costs Google less than $1 per year to provide Gmail to one person. They advertise to you, which is something we will never do. You also can't call or email anyone for help (sometimes if you pray and wait long enough, someone from Google might respond). In contrast, considering that we pay the mobile phone companies several cents for each text message, a disturbing proportion of free users (overwhelmingly educators) cost us over $50/user/year in texting fees, and that's before we spend any time on customer support. Can you see why we're on the fence regarding whether that's really sustainable business?  The truth is that most free products that educators love do not have back end costs anywhere near ours. It's something to really think about.

In fact, if you wonder why we have free K-12 plans at all, it's because I was a high school teacher and CIO of a school district. I felt clickers were valuable but outrageously expensive. Sometimes I have to re-convince the other people here at Poll Everywhere to keep our free plan limits at 32 participants instead of say, 10. It doesn't help my case when we see whining dramatics like this:

"This is so frustrating and upsetting. I am a teacher who JUST started using Poll Everywhere two weeks ago in my classroom after learning about it at a technology integration day. My students loved it the ONE time we used it, when Clear Results still worked. My district will NOT PURCHASE a membership; they don't believe in supporting this sort of technology; we are on our own to find and use this stuff. Your rate for one teacher is MUCH TOO HIGH for me to pay out of my own pocket! How frustrating that I cannot compile results any longer without forking over such a steep fee. And to think that I was considering this to be a very advantageous tool to use in my classroom! I can use it but not compile results for separate classes. How unfair of you, and how greedy."

"NOT PURCHASE" in capital letters? "Unfair" and "greedy"? Perhaps this was an emotionally driven response from a moment of frustration, but try purchasing the cheapest set of 32 clickers for $1500 out of your own pocket. By comparison, we're currently priced at $129/year. In 11 years you break even, and your clickers won't be getting any smarter during that time, but you'll still be lugging them around and replacing their batteries. This is like lusting after a Ferrari while calling the $12,000 Kia makers "greedy."  Be proactive, and start educating your district on the benefits of student response. Apply for a grant. Solicit parent or corporate sponsors. Or simply say, "It's not as good as it used to be, but at least you provide something useful for free." It's time for a reality check, since we're teetering on the brink of whether to provide any free service all. Web companies such as Blinksale, GoToMeeting, CrazyEgg, Jott, and many others have chosen to eliminate their free plans (or switch to free trials).

So let's start over. First, we didn't give you any notice that clearing polls was going premium. We didn't grandfather any previous users. And most importantly, the inability to reset a poll turns out to be a major inconvenience to all users when they try it out for the first time, then want to reuse that poll to demo to others at their church or company.  Therefore, we're turning "clear results" back on for all users. Also, we are keeping perpetually free plans for educators around, at least for now. We're considering other EDU pricing models, and I know first hand how tight school technology budgets are.  When we announce new pricing, I hope we see you vote with your school budget wallets. Sorry for the flip-flopping. If you upgraded to either the $15/mo or $129/yr plan in the last week solely in order to regain the ability to clear polls, please email us and we'll refund you.

We received a fair amount of feedback on our Get Satisfaction page (http://getsatisfaction.com/polleverywhere) and also via email. We do listen and respond to our customers -- every inquiry that needs a response gets a response. Thank you to those who engaged us respectfully. We're also wondering if you'd like a dedicated bulletin board style user forum on PollEverywhere.com. Please leave comments if you feel you'd use it more than you use our existing Get Satisfaction forum.

Also, we'd appreciate it if you'd leave some comments here and tell us what your other education software costs, and if you cover it out of pocket or your school pays for it.